Featured Post Today
print this page
Latest Post
Tampilkan postingan dengan label expectations. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label expectations. Tampilkan semua postingan

Watukushay No2 Beyond My Expectations

A few days ago I wrote a post about the next EA in the Watukushay series. For those of you who have not heard about these expert advisors, the Watukushay project was an idea I had in order to develop and evaluate a series of different expert advisors with a careful documentation of the whole creation process. The idea is that people are able to see what the necessary steps are for the creation, programming and evaluation of a long term profitable trading system.

As I said on the last post, the Watukushay No.2 expert advisor is completely based on price action. I have just finished all the preliminary coding and evaluation and I have to say that this EA far surpassed my expectations. It took me a few weeks to find a way to build a profitable logic solely based on price action as candlestick patterns depend greatly on the context in which they occur and entering or exiting trades based on a single pattern proved to be a totally unreliable and unprofitable strategy. I tried at least 15 different candlestick pattern with non of them by themselves generating a reliable system.

Finally I realized that the problem was that my approach was too simplistics. I decided to apply the sound, logical trading advice we hear from our start in trading. I decided to only enter trades on a very popular candlestick continuation pattern (the three soldiers) and to exit a trade based on either an ATR adjusted TP or a series of candlestick reversal patterns, such as a hammer, morning star or engulfing candlesticks. As you would expect from such a sound trading approach, the results were overall profitable although there was still a lot of room for improvement.

This is when it came to my mind that I was defining candlestick pattern rigidly when in the market a hammer or a 3 soldier pattern was different in 2000, 2004, 2009, etc. Of course, the easiest solution was to adapt these patterns also towards market volatility. So what do you get ? You get a trading system that is absolutely adapted to the market, more than any other system I have ever coded. The EA adjusts the size of the candlestick patterns as well as the SL and TP based on market volatility and the EA is able to profit seaminglessly from Jan 2000 to Nov 2009. This EA has given one of the most beautiful equity curves I have seen. The EA uses a very wide TP (80% of the ATR) and a wide SL (100% of the ATR) and every identification of a candlestick pattern is done based on previous bar closes so it is safe to say that backtesting is reliable (although live testing will definitely confirm this) since there are no one minute interpolation errors and no hindsight whatsoever.

You can see on the backtest shown below the equity curve given by this EA. It is very smooth with every year reaching new equity highs. The EA has a very good risk projection with the maximum draw down being just 6% for each 10% average yearly profit one wishes to obtain. However this is in fact improved by the ATR lot size money management which when risk is increased achieves an incredible 100% average yearly profit with a maximum draw down of under 40%. The EA should also be pretty much broker independent as a few pip variations will not affect the overall candlestick patterns, however, brokers that have Sunday candles vs those that dont can show different results as the overall patterns may change. Up until now this have proven to be the best results for the EUR/USD, I run several tests on other currencies but it seems that the ATR values of the patterns change a lot depending on the instrument traded and therefore all the optimization needs to be redone for every currency pair traded.
-
-
I am very pleased with this EA, this is the first EA I ever code that used absolutely no indicators (besides the ATR) that is actually more profitable and smooth in backtesting than the gods gift ATR. Of course, this EA would be tested live on my weekly newsletter and all its programming and evolution will be a new chapter on my ebook. This chapter will treat how candlestick patterns can be defined in code and how I came up with each pattern as I progressed through the programming of the EA. I am currently writing this chapter which should be out in mid December and should be around 30-60 pages long. If you are interested in the Watukushay No.2 EA please consider buying my ebook on automated trading or subscribing to my weekly newsletter to receive updates and check the live and demo accounts I am running with several expert advisors. I hope you enjoyed the article !
0 komentar

Trading Reality and Automated Trading Realistic Profit Expectations Looking at the Barclay Currency Traders Index

Yesterday I received a very interesting email from an Asirikuy member pointing me to a database showing the past 20 years of performance of top forex traders and funds (the data was originally discussed in this article). Although I had seen the indexed performance of several currency traders before this is the first time in which I had found this data in such an organized and reliable fashion, put together by Barclay Hedge. The Barclay Currency trader index,- in their own words- contains "An equal weighted composite of managed programs that trade currency futures and/or cash forwards in the inter bank market. In 2010 there are 119 currency programs included in the index". To sum it up, the Barclay Currency trader index gives you a snapshot at what the proffesionals in the field are achieving showing you exactly what profit expectations are more realistic and which ones are to be considered completely dilusional. On todays post I want to write a little bit about this data to get those of you who are unaware of what the "industry standard" is, a better perspective of what is and what is not realistically achievable in currency trading.

In the world of currency trading - and particularly in automated trading - people are often pointed out that it is "very easy" to achieve huge amounts of profit in the forex market. Moreover, real live results that show you increases of 100-1000% in a few months are not uncommon in the forex market and they appear to show new traders that you can actually make a small fortune quickly from a small investment in currency trading. However new traders often have absolutely no idea of what the industry proffesionals are achieving or what hedge funds that deal with currency instruments actually get and therefore they often believe the paid actors that pose as traders on automated trading sales sites saying that they have earned millions in currency trading in a few months.

The fact is that huge returns are possible with a huge market exposure and the problem with a huge market exposure is that it causes huge wipeouts of capital as the market evolves. So this is analogous to a person who wins the lottery. You get a huge amount of return in one run but if you spent all your lottery money in tickets, you would hardly ever win again or if you do, keeping on doing this will eventually wipe you clean. The market - I believe - has a self-limiting character which makes the systematic exploitation of market inefficiencies to achieve huge profits impossible due to the fact that huge profits require huge exposures, and huge exposures - lead to wipeouts.

The golden question is then what is realistically possible ? Since there is no way in which the "top" possible average profitability can be inferred the best measurement we have of what can be systematically achieved is what the average people in the field are actually doing and have been doing for a long time. I have to stress here that the "long time" part here is very important since long periods of time imply robustness and statistical significance. Anyone can triple an account in 2 months, but doing it for 20 years is something very different. When you have been trading for a long amount of time it means that you have very sound risk and money management tools that guarantee your long term success by limiting your present market exposure.
--
If you check the Barclay Currency Traders Index you will see that the average compounded yearly returns are not to die for. Currency traders average a 7.71% compounded anual return with a worst draw down of 15.26%, certainly traders are in average conservative. However looking at all the profit and draw down figures of the particular traders you will see that average compounded returns and maximum draw down figures are often in a 1:2 to 2:1 ratio, meaning that the average yearly return is actually never better than twice the maximum draw down. If you are thinking that these figures dont apply to you because these traders dont have the "flexibility" of small account holders, you are wrong. Many of these traders are NOT trading billions and many of them have access to liquidity you would only dream of so if anything trading conditions for most of these guys are only better than for the average forex trader.

A very important thing about this index is also that it shows that diversification is the key to long term success with the sum of all traders giving a very smooth equity curve over a 20 year long period. So probably a good lesson to learn here is that using several strategies that are all long term profitable will probably help us reduce draw downs as it helps the Barclay Currency Traders Index smooth its performance. As we have seen with the Atinalla project, having a large amount of diversification is very beneficial in the long term for trading strategies.

However the most important thing about these profit and draw down figures is that they show us the true face of market exposure and what you can expect to be realistic. If in the best case your maximum draw down level is likely going to be around one half your average compounded yearly profit then a monthly 100-200% return or a 100% yearly return for that matter are unrealistic or excessively risky for any sound investor. In the end, this currency trader index tells us that for moderate risks, forex investors should aim for a yearly profit of 20-30% if their risk appetite is moderate.

Currently our Atinalla No.1 portfolio would hold a place near the top of the Barclay Index and for this reason I would be tempted to say that it is very profitable. However we must consider here that the portfolio has not been run for 20 years on a live account and only time will tell us what its real profit and draw down targets are. Nonetheless the most important thing about Atinalla project portfolios is that they are traded with a very good profit expectation and a VERY clear worst case equity-loss scenario in mind, which is 36% for the Atinalla No.1 Portfolio.

If you would like to learn more about forex automated trading and how you too can design your automated trading systems based on sound risk and profit targets please consider buying my ebook on automated trading or joining Asirikuy to receive all ebook purchase benefits, weekly updates, check the live accounts I am running with several expert advisors and get in the road towards long term success in the forex market using automated trading systems. I hope you enjoyed the article !
0 komentar
 
Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Copyright © 2011. forcasting forex - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger